2.2 Profits

You are excited to get your brewery, called CORE Brewing Co., up and running. The timing is perfect because you are also taking an economics course and learning about how firms determine the price to charge and how much to produce in order to maximize their profits.

profits
A firm’s profits are the difference between its total revenue and total costs, including opportunity costs.
opportunity cost
The opportunity cost is the net benefit of the next-best alternative—what you give up when you make a choice.

We explained in Chapter 10 that a firm’s profits are the difference between its total revenue and total costs, including its opportunity costs of capital. The profits for your brewery are the revenue generated by beer sales minus the costs incurred in production, including the opportunity costs.

To understand profits, we need to know how much it costs to make your beer and the revenue you generate from selling it to buyers.

Total revenue

To guide your decision-making, you can create a simple data table using actual cost estimates for your brewery and price information you believe could work based on your market research to illustrate the revenue generated by producing and selling different quantities of beer.

Suppose the quantity of beer produced, denoted by the letter \(Q\), represents the number of kegs that CORE Brewing Co. produces daily. Each keg holds about 15.5 gallons (70 liters) of beer. Economists often refer to quantity as the firm’s output.

The first column in Table 12.1 displays different levels of output, ranging from \(Q = 0\) to \(Q = 10\text{ kegs per day}\). For simplicity, let’s assume your brewery produces only one beer type. Your beer’s unique taste differentiates it from your competitors’ products.

total revenue
A firm’s total revenue is the number of units sold times the price per unit.

Total revenue is the money that CORE Brewing Co. earns from selling its beer to buyers. Total revenue is calculated by multiplying the price per keg by the quantity of kegs sold at that price. Revenue is important for covering costs. It allows you to pay your workers, purchase ingredients, rent space to produce and sell your beer, and cover operational costs such as water and utilities.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
[3]
Total revenue (TR)
P × Q
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
$0
$360
$640
$840
$960
$1,000
$960
$840
$640
$360
$0

Table 12.1 Total revenue for CORE Brewing Co.

Total revenue is calculated by multiplying the price by the quantity sold at that price.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Total Quantity for CORE Brewing Co.

Table 12.1a

We start building our table with data on quantity. We assume that CORE Brewing Co. can produce anywhere from 0 to 10 kegs of beer per day.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0

Pricing at CORE Brewing Co.

Table 12.1b

We now bring in the price per keg. Our price information shows that as the price of CORE’s beer goes down, the quantity of beer produced increases. Why? When the price of CORE’s beer is high, the quantity produced will be low because the only buyers who will buy it at a high price are those who strongly prefer CORE ’s beer to the beer made by the thousands of other craft brewers. As the price falls, more buyers, who might otherwise have purchased beer made by other craft brewers, will be willing to buy CORE’s beer.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
[3]
Total Revenue (TR)
P x Q
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
0 x $400 = $0
1 x $360 = $360
2 x $320 = $640
3 x $280 = $840
4 x $240 = $960
5 x $200 = $1,000
6 x $160 = $960
7 x $120 = $840
8 x $80 = $640
9 x $40 = $360
10 x $0 = $0

Total Revenue for CORE Brewing Co.

Table 12.1c

Let’s calculate total revenue. A firm’s total revenue is the quantity of the good the firm produces times the price at which it sells that quantity of the good. As Column 3 shows, if we multiply the quantity by the price at which the company sells that quantity of the good, we get CORE’s total revenue. For example, when quantity is 0 and price is $400, total revenue is 0 x $400 = $0.

Before you calculate your brewery’s revenue, you first need information on the price. The second column in Table 12.1 provides price information, which we denote with the letter \(P\). You might be wondering where the price information comes from. As we explain in more detail later in this chapter, the price information represents what buyers are willing to pay for your craft beer. In this scenario, we can think of the buyers as restaurants and bars that purchase beer by the keg.

Suppose that when you charge buyers $400 per keg, you sell zero kegs of beer because that is the amount of your beer that buyers choose to buy at that price. When you charge buyers $280 per keg, your brewery sells 3 kegs because more buyers are interested in purchasing your beer when it is less expensive. When you charge buyers $160 per keg, you sell 6 kegs because even more buyers want to buy your beer now that the price is lower. The price information in the second column reveals an important pattern: As the price of CORE’s beer decreases, the quantity of beer produced and sold increases. Why?

Imagine setting a very high price for your beer. In this case, only the restaurants and bars that strongly prefer CORE Brewing Co. over other craft brewers are willing to buy it. These are your diehard buyers, and they may not be numerous enough to generate high sales.

Now imagine that you lower the price. As the price decreases, more buyers, who might have otherwise chosen beer from competing craft breweries, become interested in purchasing CORE Brewing Co.’s beer instead. The lower price makes your beer a more attractive option, increasing demand and sales.

Using the price (\(P\)) and quantity (\(Q\)) data, we can calculate the total revenue CORE Brewing Co. generates when producing and selling different quantities of beer. We calculate total revenue, denoted by TR, by multiplying the price of a keg of beer (\(P\)) by the quantity (\(Q\)) of beer sold at that price. For example:

  • When your price is $280 per keg, buyers want to purchase 3 kegs of your beer and your total revenue is $280 × 3 = $840.
  • When your price is $160 per keg, buyers want to purchase 6 kegs of your beer and your total revenue is $160 × 6 = $960.

The third column in Table 12.1 shows that as CORE Brewing Co. sells more beer, revenue initially increases, but only up to a certain point. Total revenue continues to rise until 5 kegs of beer, after which it begins to decline. Why does revenue grow and then shrink?

To sell 6, 7, or 8 kegs of beer, you must lower the price significantly. Although selling more kegs at a lower price may attract more buyers, each keg generates less revenue. Eventually, the price drops so low that the increase in sales can’t make up for the lost revenue per keg, causing total revenue to shrink.

Everyday Economics 12.4

Do you participate in a rewards program? Ulta, a US beauty retailer for cosmetics, fragrances, and skin and hair care products, has over 40 million buyers using its reward program, which gives buyers one point for every dollar spent and opportunities to earn double or triple points. Ulta’s reward program has been so successful that consumers post dozens of TikTok videos in which they explain how to use the program to maximize points. How might a rewards program impact a firm’s total revenue?

While understanding how revenue changes with different quantities of beer is important, profit is also influenced by costs, which we explore next.

Total costs

Craft brewers face a variety of costs when producing beer, including costs for hiring workers; purchasing hops, malt, and yeast; renting retail or industrial space to brew beer; purchasing brewing equipment; and packaging and shipping. Some costs depend on how much beer you produce. For example, the more beer you brew, the more hops and workers you need. Other costs, such as rent for your brewing space, must be paid, regardless of how much beer you produce.

opportunity cost
The opportunity cost is the net benefit of the next-best alternative—what you give up when you make a choice.
total cost
A firm’s total costs are the sum of all the costs it incurs to produce its total output, including opportunity costs.

Brewers also encounter opportunity costs in producing craft beer, such as the interest they would have earned on the capital they invest in the brewery or the profits they would have earned by producing T-shirts instead of beer. A firm’s total costs, denoted by TC, are the sum of all the costs it incurs to produce its output, including opportunity costs.

Everyday Economics 12.5

Do you consider your opportunity costs to be real costs that you incur? Or do you see them as “what-ifs” that don’t matter? Suppose you run your own business out of your garage. What else could you be doing with your time, money, and garage if you were not operating your business?

Table 12.2 extends Table 12.1 by adding total costs at different quantities of beer produced. The fourth column illustrates that as CORE Brewing Co. produces more kegs of beer, total production costs increase. More beer requires more workers, ingredients, electricity, water, and other resources, leading to higher costs. In other words, producing more beer incurs greater costs.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
[3]
Total revenue
(TR)
[4]
Total costs
(TC)
[5]
Profits
TR – TC
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
$0
$360
$640
$840
$960
$1,000
$960
$840
$640
$360
$0
$100
$180
$260
$340
$420
$500
$580
$660
$740
$820
$900
–$100
$180
$380
$500
$540
$500
$380
$180
–$100
–$460
–$900

Table 12.2 Total costs and profits for CORE Brewing Co.

Total costs increase as CORE produces more beer. Profits are the difference between total revenue and total costs.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
[3]
Total Revenue
(TR)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
$0
$360
$640
$840
$960
$1,000
$960
$840
$640
$360
$0

Total costs and profits for CORE Brewing Co., using data from Table 12.1

Table 12.2a

Let’s start with the data from Table 12.1, which shows CORE’s quantity, price, and total revenue.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price
(P)
[3]
Total Revenue
(TR)
[4]
Total Costs
(TC)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
$0
$360
$640
$840
$960
$1,000
$960
$840
$640
$360
$0
$100
$180
$260
$340
$420
$500
$580
$660
$740
$820
$900

Total costs and profits for CORE Brewing Co., including total costs

Table 12.2b

We add hypothetical costs to the table to show CORE’s total costs when it produces different quantities of beer. As the fourth column shows, the more kegs of beer CORE produces, the greater its costs of production. As CORE produces greater quantities of beer, it uses more workers, hops, water, electricity, and yeast, which results in higher total costs.

[1]
Quantity (Q)
(kegs per day)
[2]
Price (P)
[3]
Total Revenue
(TR)
[4]
Total Costs
(TC)
[5]
Profits
TR – TC
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
$400
$360
$320
$280
$240
$200
$160
$120
$80
$40
$0
$0
$360
$640
$840
$960
$1,000
$960
$840
$640
$360
$0
$100
$180
$260
$340
$420
$500
$580
$660
$740
$820
$900
$0 − $100 = −$100
$360 − $180 = $180
$640 − $260 = $380
$840 − $340 = $500
$960 − $420 = $540
$1,000 − $500 = $500
$960 − $580 = $380
$840 − $660 = $180
$640 − $740 = −$100
$360 − $820 = −$460
$0 − $900 = −$900

Total costs and profits for CORE Brewing Co.

Table 12.2c

Profits are the difference between CORE’s total revenue and its total costs. We can add profits to our table. For example, when CORE prices its beer at $400 per keg, it sells 0 kegs. Its total revenue is $0 and its total costs are $100. Profits are then calculated as $0 – $100 = –$100, which represents negative profits or a loss of $100. When CORE prices its beer at $360 per keg, it sells 2 kegs at that price. Its revenue is $360 and its costs to produce two kegs are $180. Its profits are therefore $360 – $180 = $180. Because the number is positive, CORE is earning a positive profit.

Economic profits

profits
A firm’s profits are the difference between its total revenue and total costs, including opportunity costs.

Now that we have data on total costs and total revenue, we can determine CORE Brewing Co.’s profits. CORE’s profits are the difference between the total revenue that it receives from selling beer and the total costs of producing it. We show these profits in the last column of Table 12.2.

  • If CORE produces and sells 2 kegs, total revenue is $640, total costs are $260, and profits (the difference between total revenue and total costs) are $640 – $260 = $380.
  • If CORE produces and sells 4 kegs, total revenue is $960, total costs are $420, and profits are $960 – $420 = $540.

As Table 12.2 shows, the brewery’s profits are positive from 1 keg to 7 kegs of beer because total revenue exceeds total costs. Even though profits are positive at each of these output levels, they grow larger as you produce up to 4 kegs of beer. After that, profits shrink when you produce 5, 6, or 7 kegs. At 8 kegs of beer, your profits turn negative, which means that it costs more to produce your beer than the revenue you earn selling it to buyers, and you are making a loss.

Let’s create a visual map to help us better understand how profits vary across different combinations of price and quantity. In Figure 12.4, we place the price of beer on the vertical axis and the quantity of kegs on the horizontal axis. The different colors in the figure represent different levels of profits at each price-quantity combination. This figure is similar to the heat map we saw in Chapter 8 that illustrated Annika’s preferences for ice cream and burritos. Here, the heat map shows how profits vary instead of preferences.

This heatmap shows CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity. The horizonal axis displays the quantity of beer in terms of kegs per day. The vertical axis displays the price per keg of beer, measured in dollars. The diagram displays four sample combinations of price and quantity. It shows that high price combined with high quantity leads to highest profit, whereas low price combined with high quantity leads to lowest profit. A combination of medium price and quantity leads to medium profit. A combination of high price and low quantity leads to less-than medium profit.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-12-4

Figure 12.4 CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity.

CORE Brewing Co. will make the most profits if it can charge a high price and sell many kegs of beer. It will make the least profits if it sells a lot of beer at a low price (because it will not be covering its costs of production). Selling a few kegs at a high price leads to some, but not much, profit. Selling an intermediate number of kegs at neither too high nor too low a price leads to intermediate profits.

Selling a lot of beer at a high price means the firm makes a lot of profit: This diagram shows a step of plotting the heatmap that shows CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity. The horizonal axis displays the quantity of beer in terms of kegs per day. The vertical axis displays the price per keg of beer, measured in dollars. The diagram shows that high price combined with high quantity leads to highest profit.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-12-4a

Selling a lot of beer at a high price means the firm makes a lot of profit

Here we are talking about the profits that CORE Brewing Co. would like to obtain—that is, the owners’ goals for the firm. We stipulate what constrains the firm later in this chapter. A firm’s profit is the amount that it sells at a given price (its revenues) minus its costs. If a firm can sell a large number of goods at a high price, then (for given costs), it can make a significant amount of profit. In the figure, CORE Brewing Co.’s highest profits (in bright yellow at the top right) occur where it can hypothetically sell a lot of goods at a high price.

Selling a lot of beer at a low price means the firm makes a very low profit, or losses: This diagram shows a step of plotting the heatmap that shows CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity. The horizonal axis displays the quantity of beer in terms of kegs per day. The vertical axis displays the price per keg of beer, measured in dollars. The diagram shows that low price combined with high quantity leads to lowest profit.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-12-4b

Selling a lot of beer at a low price means the firm makes a very low profit, or losses

A firm’s profit is the amount that it sells at a given price (its revenues) minus its costs. If a firm sells a large number of goods at a low price, then (for given costs), it may make little profit or incur significant losses. In the figure, CORE Brewing Co.’s costs are such that the firm will make losses (in dark blue at the bottom right) if it sells many kegs of beer at a price of $40 per keg or lower.

Selling few kegs at a high price leads to some, but not much, profit: This diagram shows a step of plotting the heatmap that shows CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity. The horizonal axis displays the quantity of beer in terms of kegs per day. The vertical axis displays the price per keg of beer, measured in dollars. The diagram shows that a combination of high price and low quantity leads to less-than medium profit.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-12-4c

Selling few kegs at a high price leads to some, but not much, profit

Compared to the possibility of making low profits or losses by selling many kegs at a low price or making high profits by selling many kegs at a high price, the firm might consider how much profit it will make from selling few goods at a high price because selling fewer goods means that its costs are lower. In this case, the revenues from selling few goods are comparatively low given the costs, and so the firm makes some, but not a lot of, profit from selling few goods at a high price, as shown by the purple area in the top left.

Selling some kegs at a medium price makes neither the highest nor the lowest profit: This diagram shows a step of plotting the heatmap that shows CORE Brewing Co.’s more profitable and less profitable combinations of price and quantity. The horizonal axis displays the quantity of beer in terms of kegs per day. The vertical axis displays the price per keg of beer, measured in dollars. The diagram shows that a combination of medium price and quantity leads to medium profit.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-12-4d

Selling some kegs at a medium price makes neither the highest nor the lowest profit

Compared to the possibility of making low profits or losses by selling many kegs at a low price or making high profits by selling many kegs at a high price, the firm might consider how much profit it will make from selling some goods at an intermediate price because selling fewer goods means that its costs are lower, while it also considers the benefit of a lower price than in Steps 1 and 3. The firm makes an intermediate level of profits (shaded in pink) compared to selling a lot of goods at a high price, but the owners of the firm likely know that it might not be possible to sell a lot of goods at a high price, even if they would like to.

doing the best you can
Doing the best you can means that, from the set of actions available to them, people will choose the action that they believe will result in the outcome that they value the most, taking into account what they believe the other player will do in response to their choice.

Dark-purple areas represent combinations that lead to the lowest profits (losses). If CORE Brewing Co. sells many kegs but at a very low price (for example, less than $40 per keg), its profits are negative because the total revenue earned from selling at such a low price is less than the total costs to produce many kegs of beer. While buyers would love to pay only $40 per keg, Figure 12.4 illustrates that selling at a very low price is not consistent with doing the best you can to earn the highest possible profits.

In contrast, bright-yellow areas show combinations with the highest profits. If CORE can sell many kegs at a high price (for example, more than $400 per keg), profits will be very high. As the owner of this brewery, you might think that doing the best you can means selling a large number of kegs at a high price because that will ensure that you are maximizing your profits. However, this is not the case.

principle of trade-offs and opportunity cost
The gains you make by choosing some action typically come at the cost of gains that would have been possible had you acted differently.

Although you might prefer to charge a very high price for your beer and sell a large number of kegs at that price (yellow-shaded area), you need to remember that not all combinations are feasible. As we saw in Table 12.2, not all buyers are willing to pay $400 for a keg of your beer, and producing large quantities of beer adds significant cost. These constraints mean that combinations involving both extremely high prices and large quantities are not realistic options for your brewery. We can see the trade-off and opportunity costs principle come into play. To sell more kegs, you may need to lower your price, giving up higher revenue on those units in exchange for higher production and sales.

the principle of doing the best you can
Doing the best you can means that, from the set of actions available to them, people will choose the action that they believe will result in the outcome that they value the most, taking into account what they believe the other player will do in response to their choice.

The doing the best you can principle reminds us that your goal is to choose the best option among the feasible ones. The bright-yellow areas in Figure 12.4 are not feasible. In other words, you want to earn as much profit as possible, but you must make your decisions within the boundaries set by your buyers’ willingness to pay and your production costs. This suggests that doing the best you can might take you somewhere in the middle of Figure 12.4 where you sell some kegs at a medium price and you earn profits somewhere in between the highest and lowest levels.

When we talk about profits, we specifically mean economic profits, which take into account opportunity costs, which were embedded in the TC column in Table 12.2. Economic profits differ from accounting profits, which consider only explicit costs and do not take into account opportunity costs. As a result, accounting profits are always higher than economic profits.

Math Extension 12.2 Accounting vs. economic profits

Suppose that CORE Brewing Co.’s total revenue for the year is $250,000, and its spending on wages, ingredients, rent, and utilities totals $150,000. These are considered explicit or direct costs or out-of-pocket expenses CORE Brewing Co. pays for the resources it uses to produce its beer. We can calculate CORE’s accounting profits using the following formula:

\[\text{accounting profits} = \text{total revenue} – \text{explicit costs}\]
\[\text{accounting profits} = \$250,000 – \$150,000 = \$100,000\]

Accounting profits tell us whether CORE Brewing Co. is covering its direct expenses.

However, economists are interested in whether CORE Brewing Co. is doing better than its next best option.

Suppose that the next best option would be for you, the owner of CORE Brewing Co., to work as an economic consultant earning $70,000 a year. This represents an opportunity cost since it is what you would be earning if you didn’t operate your brewery. While your brewery is making $100,000 in accounting profit, the economist would say that you are only earning $30,000 more than your next best option. In other words, you are doing $30,000 better running your brewery than if you were working as a consultant. We can calculate economic profits using the following formula:

\[\text{economic profits} = \text{total revenue} – \text{explicit costs} – \text{opportunity costs}\] \[\text{economic profits} = \$250,000 – \$150,000 – \$70,000 = \$30,000\]

What if your opportunity costs were $100,000? In other words, your consultant’s salary is $100,000 instead of $70,000. This would leave you with economic profits equal to zero (economic profits $250,000 – $150,000 – $150,000 = 0), which means that you are doing just as well running your business as you would be doing something else with your time or money.

What if your opportunity costs were $150,000? This would mean your economic profits are negative and you are earning a loss of $50,000 (economic profits = $250,000 – $150,000 – $150,000 = –$50,000). This would suggest you are doing $50,000 worse running your brewery than if you were working as a consultant and not running your brewery.

What if you decided not to include opportunity costs in your calculation of profits? In the example above, if you don’t factor in what you would be earning if you worked as a consultant, you are ignoring the value of your time. You might keep working long hours thinking your business is doing well (accounting profit of $100,000), when in fact you are earning $50,000 less than you would working as a consultant. You end up overcommitting your time to the brewery, working more hours than make sense, because you are not recognizing that your time has value elsewhere.

While Table 12.2 shows us where economic profits are highest, it doesn’t explain why profit is maximized at that point or how CORE Brewing can get there. The table shows the outcome, but not the reasoning behind it. To truly understand how firms make decisions, we need to go deeper. In the next few sections, we examine the different types of costs that make up total costs, explore the importance of opportunity costs, and learn how firms use marginal analysis to weigh the additional benefits of producing one more unit against the additional costs. Without this deeper understanding, the table is just a snapshot and not a decision-making tool quite yet.

Data Extension 12.2 Women in craft brew

According to the Brewery Association, in 2021 only 3% of US breweries were owned by women (Figure E12.2). Although women account for only a small percentage of craft brewers today, they were the first brewers. As Gregg Smith writes in his book Beer in America: The Early Years: 1587–1840, “When money got involved, men increasingly started brewing.”

To learn more about women’s role as the original brewers, read the essay “How Women Brewsters Saved the World” by Tara Nurin.

This pie chart shows the composition of ownership of US breweries by gender in 2021. The pie chart shows that 58.6% of breweries were owned by men. 38.5% of breweries were owned by men and women together. Only 2.9% of breweries were owned by women.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-e12-2

Figure E12.2 Ownership of US breweries by gender, 2021.

Bart Watson. 2021. New Owner Demographic Benchmarking Data. Brewers Association.

A 2021 survey from the Brewers Association found that only 0.2% of brewers identified as nonbinary.

Listen to J. Michelle Brock describe her co-authored study that found evidence of gender bias in bank lending in Turkey.

Despite their underrepresentation in modern craft brewing, women and non-binary brewers are no different from men brewers who want to produce high-quality beer, earn profits, and support their environmental and social goals. However, women and non-binary brewers may encounter gender-specific barriers in their efforts to earn profit. For example, they may find it challenging to operate their businesses if banks are less likely to give loans to them, more likely to charge them higher interest rates on loans, and/or more likely to require a guarantor (someone who agrees to pay the borrower’s loan when the borrower is unable to pay it) on loans to women or non-binary individuals. Organizations such as Pink Boots Society support women and non-binary individuals in the brewing industry to overcome some of these barriers.

Women owners might also face discrimination and bias from consumers. According to a 2019 study by Elise Tak, Sarah A. Soule, and Shelley Correll titled “Those Who Don’t Know, Discriminate: Gender Inequality in Product Markets”, men have a negative bias against craft beer produced by women. In the study, the authors asked participants to evaluate beer based on a product label that provided fictitious information about the brewer’s gender. For example, the brewer’s name was specified as Sarah or David (Figure E12.3). The label also provided a brief description of the brewer’s career and referred to Sarah with she pronouns and David with he pronouns. The overall evaluation index consisted of participant responses to questions about their likelihood of buying the beer, the amount they were willing to pay for the beer, and their expectations of the beer’s quality and taste.

The researchers found evidence that a woman brewer’s beer is evaluated worse than an identical beer produced by a man. However, if the beer is recognized as having won an award, then beer produced by women is evaluated more favorably. The researchers also found that when participants had greater knowledge of craft beer (they were beer enthusiasts), they did not evaluate beer produced by women more negatively. These results suggest that recognizing the talent of women brewers may reduce some buyers’ bias.

This diagram is a picture taken from the internet. It presents a label used in a gender bias study in the field of craft beer production.
Fullscreen
https://books.core-econ.org/uoe-101/12-02.html#figure-e12-3

Figure E12.3 Label used in gender bias study.

Aine Doris. 2019. “Better if it’s Man-Made”. Insights by Stanford Business. March.

While all firms try to do the best they can, the study referenced above suggests that women and men face different constraints.

Exercise 12.2

  1. Think about a small business in your community, such as a local bakery or boutique. Describe the potential sources of revenue for this business and the types of costs it might incur. How do these revenues and costs compare to those of CORE Brewing Co.?

  2. Consider the scenario of Table 12.2. Suppose the rent for CORE Brewing Co. increases by $100, adding to its total costs. Additionally, CORE decides to increase its prices by 20%. Determine the new quantity of beer (in kegs) that generates the highest amount of profit. Is profit higher or lower compared to the original scenario?

Question 12.2

Which of the following statements are true about economic profit? Choose all that apply.

  • Economic profit is always higher than accounting profit.
  • Economic profit includes opportunity costs in its calculation.
  • A firm earning positive economic profit is covering all its costs, including opportunity costs.
  • Negative economic profit indicates that a firm’s total revenue exceeds its total costs.
  • Economic profit is usually lower than accounting profit because economic profit includes opportunity costs.
  • Economic profit accounts for opportunity costs.
  • Positive economic profit means a firm is covering all explicit and opportunity costs.
  • Negative economic profit means total costs exceed total revenue.